In Washington, you generally do not have to know the other person personally to ask for protection under RCW 7.105. The key question is usually not whether you had a prior relationship, but whether the facts fit the legal definition of unwanted behavior covered by the statute.
RCW 7.105 is part of Washington’s civil protection order system. In general, these cases focus on the conduct, the impact on the protected person, and whether the legal requirements are met. That means harassment or threatening conduct from a stranger, acquaintance, coworker, neighbor, former partner, or online contact may all potentially be relevant, depending on the facts.
That said, the exact type of order requested and the facts supporting it matter a lot. Some protection order categories are designed for specific relationships or specific kinds of conduct, while others are broader. So even if you do not personally know the person, the request may still be possible if the behavior meets the statute’s requirements.
It is also important to understand that filing and getting an order are not the same thing. A court usually looks for evidence, a clear description of what happened, and whether the situation fits the legal standard. If the facts are unclear or the legal category does not match, the court may ask for more information or may not issue the order.
Because Washington protection order law can be fact-sensitive, people often find it helpful to talk with a lawyer, domestic violence advocate, legal aid office, or court facilitator before filing. This is especially true if the other person is a stranger, the conduct happened online, the incidents were spread out over time, or there are related criminal, landlord-tenant, family law, or workplace issues.
This page provides general information only for Washington State. Rules can differ in other states, and even within Washington the best legal option may depend on the specific facts.
People asking this question are often trying to figure out whether a protection order under Washington’s RCW 7.105 requires a personal relationship with the other person. In general, they want to know whether harassment by a stranger, acquaintance, coworker, neighbor, or online user can qualify, or whether only someone they know well can be involved. They may also be asking whether the court cares more about the relationship or the behavior itself.
In Washington, the general rule is that you usually do not need to know the alleged harasser personally to seek civil protection under RCW 7.105. What matters more is whether the facts fit the legal standard for the specific protection order requested. The court typically looks at the conduct, the context, and the evidence, rather than requiring a personal relationship in every case. However, different protection order categories can have different requirements, so the relationship between the parties may still matter depending on the type of order and the facts.
RCW 7.105 covers a civil protection order system, but the legal requirements can vary depending on the specific order category. Some orders are based mainly on conduct, while others may be tied to a family, household, dating, or workplace context.
The court usually focuses on whether the behavior qualifies as harassment, threats, stalking-like conduct, unwanted contact, or other covered conduct. Knowing the person is not always the deciding factor.
Screenshots, messages, witness statements, incident notes, photos, police reports, and other records may matter because the court usually needs facts, not just conclusions.
A single incident may or may not be enough depending on the legal category. Repeated behavior, escalation, or recent contact can be important.
You do not necessarily have to know the person personally, but the court usually needs to know who the respondent is. If the person is anonymous, unknown, or using fake accounts, identifying information can become a practical issue.
Sometimes the situation may overlap with criminal law, employment law, landlord-tenant problems, family law, or online impersonation issues. Those overlaps can affect the best next step.
You may want to talk to a lawyer if the person is anonymous, the incidents involve online conduct, the facts are disputed, there is a history of family or dating violence, the person is a coworker or neighbor, or you are unsure which protection order category applies. A lawyer can also help if there are overlapping criminal, custody, housing, or employment concerns. Because protection order law is sensitive and fact-specific, legal advice can be especially helpful before filing or if a court hearing is scheduled.
Browse lawyer profiles in Washington before deciding who to contact about your situation.
Find Washington LawyersA dated timeline helps show the pattern, sequence, and seriousness of the conduct.
Digital communications often provide direct evidence of threats, unwanted contact, or harassment.
These may show repeated contact attempts or threatening language.
Visual evidence may help show vandalism, surveillance, physical proximity, or other conduct.
People who saw or heard the conduct may help confirm what happened.
These records may support the timeline, although they do not automatically decide the court issue.
Earlier messages may show context, escalation, or a history of unwanted behavior.
Usernames, profile links, and account details may help identify the respondent when the person is not personally known.
This page is for general legal information only and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures may change and may vary by jurisdiction. You should talk to a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction about your specific situation.
Community Replies
Users and attorneys can reply here with general information, experience, or attorney commentary.
Members can post a User Comment. Verified attorneys can also post an Attorney Commentary.